top of page

Beauty

On the basis of observation, technically males of a species are more aesthetically pleasing and talented than the females of the species. Males have to bear the burden of pleasing a female while competing with numerous other males, thus they'll definitely have better talents in their arsenal. While there's no such need for a female because genetically males are going to be attracted to them.


Now, human females are found sexually attractive by human males and the females of this species take quite a lot pride in this. However, they should know, just as a human finds a peacock more attractive than a peahen, a lion more attractive than a lioness, it's natural that for any species with adequate cognitive abilities, will find a human male much more attractive and talented than the female of the same species.


So the human females are attractive only for human males. Whilst the human males are the beautiful ones for rest of the zoological inhabitants of Earth.

Deal with it, human females.

Recent Posts

See All
Systematic failure

I was at the Gomti Nagar Railway station today, when I saw a commotion at the platform. As I approached the group of people, I saw a man lying unconscious on the platform and a man performing CPR on h

 
 
 
Goodbye, 2025!

2025, too, comes to an end. I do this exercise at the end of each year to see how much I've changed. However, I suppose it's not quite right to just look at my yearly progress by comparing the two end

 
 
 
Kindness

I've been thinking about it for a while. It's probably too trivial for others, but not for me. I always found it hard to believe when seeing or hearing instances where people aren't kind. Isn't kindne

 
 
 

Comments


  • Instagram
  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • YouTube
  • GitHub
bottom of page